ForensicS
Our work on forensics seeks to promote the use of scientifically valid and reliable forensic evidence for the purposes of criminal investigation and prosecution. Lack of manpower, infrastructural inadequacies and organisational mismanagement are known as the main reasons for the sub par functioning of government forensic science laboratories. Improvement in administration and functioning of these laboratories guided by an effective regulatory system is necessary to ensure the quality of forensic service.
Currently, there is no legislative framework to regulate the functioning of forensic laboratories in India or enforce any quality standards. This leads to variance in practices adopted by investigative agencies and forensic laboratories in different states. On part of the judiciary, there has been little engagement on admissibility and weight of the forensic evidence, and how it must be guided by the scientific validity and reliability of such evidence. In order to build a sustainable and reliable model for Indian forensics, the law and practice on expert evidence must be revamped. This will not only ensure the use of accurate and reliable evidence in casework but also affect broader change towards improving the existing standards and procedures followed in forensic laboratories.
RESEARCH
Our current research focuses on understanding the challenges in administration and functioning of forensic science laboratories in India. This is designed as a quantitative and qualitative survey of the forensic laboratories on aspects relating to budgetary allocations, case management, manpower, research and training, infrastructure and equipment, and quality assurance. Our research also covers comparative practices from different jurisdictions on laboratory protocols, forensic regulation and law on expert evidence.
LITIGATION
Our forensic litigation efforts focus on challenging the use of unreliable expert evidence concerning different forensic disciplines. We also pursue change in law and practice relating to forensic science and expert evidence through strategic intervention.
CAPACITY BUILDING
Considering the lack of understanding within the legal community on forensic science and their limitations, we conduct regular training and workshops for legal professionals and judges covering different disciplines of forensic science and practice of expert evidence. We also build materials for broader public engagement to make issues on forensic science and law more accessible. Project 39A in collaboration with Eleos Justice at Monash University has also created an interdisciplinary course on forensic science and law. You can learn more and enrol here.
RESOURCES
Forensic science in the dock: the questions we are not asking
Shreya Rastogi, Devina Malaviya & Devina Sikdar